<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.themoneyblogs.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Christian Science Monitor</title>
 <link>http://www.themoneyblogs.com/christian-science-monitor</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Two Paths for the News Business: Retrenchment versus Reshaping</title>
 <link>http://www.themoneyblogs.com/stock-investing/the-longish-view/two-paths-for-the-news-business-retrenchment-versus-reshaping.html</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Christian Science Monitor and The New York Times are venerable, first-tier journalistic enterprises.&amp;nbsp; The news about the news business, though, is generally downbeat: ad revenues going to  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.themoneyblogs.com/stock-investing/the-longish-view/two-paths-for-the-news-business-retrenchment-versus-reshaping.html&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.themoneyblogs.com/stock-investing/the-longish-view/two-paths-for-the-news-business-retrenchment-versus-reshaping.html#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.themoneyblogs.com/stock-investing/the-longish-view">The Longish View</category>
 <category domain="http://www.themoneyblogs.com/christian-science-monitor">Christian Science Monitor</category>
 <category domain="http://www.themoneyblogs.com/conde-nast">Conde Nast</category>
 <category domain="http://www.themoneyblogs.com/nws">NWS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.themoneyblogs.com/nyt">NYT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.themoneyblogs.com/online-publishing">online publishing</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:52:48 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>tmcmh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">11863 at http://www.themoneyblogs.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
