| Search by tag or site | Login to my blog ? Start my own blog |
![]() |
Random Roger's Big PictureThis is a stock market blog about portfolio management, foreign stocks, exchange traded funds and options. |
Oy Vey
Posted on 12/06/2007 07:50:48 | Link | Post Comment
I am trying to figure out what to make of the Paulson and Hillary ideas for homeowner bailouts.
The first thing is that some sort of government lead thing is going to have unintended consequences. Michael Shedlock had a good post that mentions among other things that anyone who lied to get a loan can't really come back with W-2 that shows a different number meaning that the idea will turn out to be nothing but "lip service."
The entire situation we are in now is an unintended consequence of rates being kept low for too long. Whatever they have in mind now and then whatever it is they actually end up doing will cause problems. I am not going to be the one to figure out what all the issues are ahead of time nor do I know if the problems caused will be worse then the original issue but if they actually execute a plan, watch out.
One aspect of this that also troubles me, especially after hearing what Hillary had to say, was that we need to help people who were the victim of unscrupulous lending practices yada yada. My wife and I each have family who have made catastrophically bad personal finance decisions. Much as I hate to say these family members don't get it and I doubt they ever will.
Lying about income and taking on more mortgage than can obviously be afforded ultimately falls on the borrower no matter what anyone else says along the way.
This is more about individuals making very bad decisions than it is unscrupulous anything and now we are going to bail people out to go on and make more bad decisions in the future.
I realize my stance is particularly unsympathetic.
Speaking of Hillary, I may be wrong but I am convinced she either does not understand how capitalism works or she does not believe in it, except maybe in her commodity trading account.
Just curious, how many jobs are going to be created if people making $50,000-70,000 pay $500 less in taxes and we pay for that by increasing the tax for people who actually make enough to create jobs?
The solace is that if Hillary wins she will not be able to enact a whole lot from the standpoint of very few campaign ideas ever get implemented.
The first thing is that some sort of government lead thing is going to have unintended consequences. Michael Shedlock had a good post that mentions among other things that anyone who lied to get a loan can't really come back with W-2 that shows a different number meaning that the idea will turn out to be nothing but "lip service."
The entire situation we are in now is an unintended consequence of rates being kept low for too long. Whatever they have in mind now and then whatever it is they actually end up doing will cause problems. I am not going to be the one to figure out what all the issues are ahead of time nor do I know if the problems caused will be worse then the original issue but if they actually execute a plan, watch out.
One aspect of this that also troubles me, especially after hearing what Hillary had to say, was that we need to help people who were the victim of unscrupulous lending practices yada yada. My wife and I each have family who have made catastrophically bad personal finance decisions. Much as I hate to say these family members don't get it and I doubt they ever will.
Lying about income and taking on more mortgage than can obviously be afforded ultimately falls on the borrower no matter what anyone else says along the way.
This is more about individuals making very bad decisions than it is unscrupulous anything and now we are going to bail people out to go on and make more bad decisions in the future.
I realize my stance is particularly unsympathetic.
Speaking of Hillary, I may be wrong but I am convinced she either does not understand how capitalism works or she does not believe in it, except maybe in her commodity trading account.
Just curious, how many jobs are going to be created if people making $50,000-70,000 pay $500 less in taxes and we pay for that by increasing the tax for people who actually make enough to create jobs?
The solace is that if Hillary wins she will not be able to enact a whole lot from the standpoint of very few campaign ideas ever get implemented.
- Apr 2007
- Mar 2007
- Feb 2007
- Jan 2007
- Dec 2006
- Nov 2006
- Oct 2006
- Sep 2006
- Aug 2006
- Jul 2006
- Jun 2006
- May 2006
![]()
Examples
Morpheus Trading - Tue Sep 02, 2008 05:21AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them [read more]
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them [read more]
Morpheus Trading - Thu Sep 04, 2008 04:34AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if [read more]
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if [read more]
Morpheus Trading - Wed Sep 03, 2008 04:35AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them [read more]
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them [read more]












<< My Home | TheMoneyBlogs Home