Quantcast This Is Rich
Search by tag or site Login to my blog ? Start my own blog














TheMoneyBlogs
Home
About
Create your own blog
Contact us
Vote for this blog!

Poor and Stupid

How big government, big business, big media and big academia block your road to financial freedom- and tell you it's for your own good.

This Is Rich

Posted on 05/09/2007 18:19:59 | Link | Post Comment
Billionaire heiress Teresa Heinz Kerry oozes platitudes for the poor working woman on Mothers Day -- "family values" and "mothers? virtues" and "vital sustenance" -- to argue that Social Security benefits be increased for women. Not a word about how these benefits are to be paid for, or by whom. Not a word. Ms. Heinz is surely a woman who is not in the habit of wondering how things are to be paid for (at least not anymore -- having married her money, she once knew exactly how, but those years are behind her now).

Okay, now let's look at the facts. The reality is that women already do far better than men under existing Social Security rules. Look at this table of internal rates of return from Social Security from the Social Security Actuary. You'll see that regardless of age or income level, women systematically already get higher internal rates of return from Social Security than men do. For example, a medium-earner single male born in 1955 gets a 1.9% "return" from his FICA tax "investment" in Social Security. But an otherwise identical woman gets a 2.38% "return."

A single-earner couple does even better -- a 4.29% "return." And since in most single-earner couples it's the man who earns, that means the non-working woman is the lucky lottery winner in Social Security. It's not true, as Heinz claims -- in breathtaking ignorance of the facts -- that "Fairness to women is not a hallmark of our current system."

There is one sense in which the system is unfair to women -- but it has nothing to do with anything that Heinz is talking about. When a stay-at-home mom goes to work and that single-earner couple becomes a two-earner couple, the "return" drop to 2.31%. That's a very high tax to pay for a woman who returns to the workforce.

Stock Quote or
Examples
ATM Wallstreet - Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:07PM
Today we have the Fed speaking and release of Fed mi [read more]
Morpheus Trading - Tue Oct 07, 2008 08:33AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them [read more]
Morpheus Trading - Fri Oct 10, 2008 01:40AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if [read more]

PREMIER SPONSORED LINKS

Most Visited Blogs | Most Popular Blogs | Most Recent Blogs | Contact Us | Terms and conditions | Privacy Policy

The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on TheMoneyBlogs.com are provided for personal finance, education and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of TheMoneyBlogs.com and there is no implied endorsement by TheMoneyBlogs.com of any advice or trading strategy. The analysts and employees or affiliates of TheMoneyBlogs.com may hold positions in the stocks or industries discussed here. Your use of this and all information contained on TheMoneyBlogs.com is governed by the Terms and Conditions of Use. Please click the link to view those terms. Follow this link to read our Editorial Policy.

Copyright © 2008 The Connors Group, Inc.