Quantcast The Quality Of Inequality
Search by tag or site Login to my blog ? Start my own blog














TheMoneyBlogs
Home
About
Create your own blog
Contact us
Vote for this blog!

Poor and Stupid

How big government, big business, big media and big academia block your road to financial freedom- and tell you it's for your own good.

The Quality Of Inequality

Posted on 03/08/2007 09:06 AM | Link | Post Comment
The debate about income inequality statistics rages on, with a terrific dialog on the subject hosted at Cato Unbound. The star of the show is Alan Reynolds, who has committed the heresy of questioning the validity of the Picketty/Saez and CBO data that, despite manifest flaws, is always cited as definitive. Here's a note from Alan on the latest round:
Everyone keeps missing the point. For example:

David Wessel, Wall Street Journal February 15 says, "It's simple: Taking all federal taxes into account -- including payroll as well as income taxes, and allocating corporate profits and taxes paid on them to those who hold shares -- the CBO says those in the bottom fifth pay an average of $4.50 in taxes for every $100 they take in. Those in the top 1% pay $31.10 in taxes for every $100 they take in."

That's wrong. The CBO does not allocate corporate profits to those who hold shares. The CBO doesn't know who owns shares, but they're trying to estimate who owns capital (including capital that isn't taxed, like IRAs and munis and homes).

Robert Frank, in the Wall Street Journal February 15 says, "The nation's richest 1% controlled 51% of the country's individually held stocks in 2004, the latest period measured. That was up from 41% in 1989."

That's wrong. Only about 38% of stock is still individually held, and it's falling fast. Most of the indivdiually held stock is taxable, but most IRAs, 529s & 401ks are in mutual funds and won't be taxable for a long time, if ever.

After fixing those mistakes, the CBO data show the top 1% with about 11% of pretax income and not a rising share at that.

Since their after-tax estimate was already flat from 1988 to 2003, the top 1% has a falling share of net income.

Stock Quote or
Examples
ATM Wallstreet - Mon Oct 06, 2008 03:39PM
Made several great trades today. Traded the QID, QQ [read more]
ATM Wallstreet - Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:07PM
Today we have the Fed speaking and release of Fed mi [read more]
Morpheus Trading - Tue Oct 07, 2008 08:33AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them [read more]

PREMIER SPONSORED LINKS

Most Visited Blogs | Most Popular Blogs | Most Recent Blogs | Contact Us | Terms and conditions | Privacy Policy

The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on TheMoneyBlogs.com are provided for personal finance, education and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of TheMoneyBlogs.com and there is no implied endorsement by TheMoneyBlogs.com of any advice or trading strategy. The analysts and employees or affiliates of TheMoneyBlogs.com may hold positions in the stocks or industries discussed here. Your use of this and all information contained on TheMoneyBlogs.com is governed by the Terms and Conditions of Use. Please click the link to view those terms. Follow this link to read our Editorial Policy.

Copyright © 2008 The Connors Group, Inc.