Quantcast The China Bill
Search by tag or site Login to my blog ? Start my own blog














TheMoneyBlogs
Home
About
Create your own blog
Contact us
Vote for this blog!

Poor and Stupid

How big government, big business, big media and big academia block your road to financial freedom- and tell you it's for your own good.

The China Bill

Posted on 06/14/2007 19:51:48 | Link | Post Comment
A very plugged-in Washington friend, who will only let me identify him as "Mick Danger," has a prediction about the new anti-China bill introduced in the Senate yesterday:
I am going out on a limb (based on gut instinct and 30 years of experience.)

If Paulson recommends a veto, Bush will veto. McConnell will sustain. All this bravado is just that.

I tend to agree. The bill itself is a dog's breakfast of bureaucratic procedures, most of which are entirely discretionary with the Treasury Department. Hard to believe that the Senate would go to the wall with a veto override on something so without substance. That said, I have to wonder whether Bush would even feel he needed to veto it?

Update... Mick replies,

It?s a diplomatic dance with potentially serious consequences, correct? The conventional wisdom is that ?nothing? will happen.

I think Paulson can get some added influence with the Chinese if he acts to defend our trading system from our protectionists.

Conversely, Schumer can only lose at his game if someone raises the ante on him. The game for aggressive Democrats such as Schumer is to put on different dramas for different audiences ? playing in the Union Hall, the Dems get confrontational with the Chinese because they are ?unfairly manipulating their currency and undermining the average Americans? wages.? Around the corner at the Palace with a Wall Street clientele, they sing ?Don?t Worry, Be Happy?.

The big trouble with all this China-bashing is that disrupting the status quo is more dangerous to us than living with it. ?Solving it? is not possible ? I?m told that the Chinese lack the systems to manage their economy with a market-set currency so they prefer to set it. Naturally, they pick a range which benefits them. (Do you agree?)

A Bush veto pulls both sets of curtains back. Both audiences get pissed.

Stock Quote or
Examples
Morpheus Trading - Sun Aug 24, 2008 06:22AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if [read more]
Morpheus Trading - Thu Aug 28, 2008 02:39AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if [read more]
Boucher On The Big Picture - Thu Aug 28, 2008 05:01PM
Market Needs to Show Volume and Breadth To Signal Next M [read more]

PREMIER SPONSORED LINKS

Most Visited Blogs | Most Popular Blogs | Most Recent Blogs | Contact Us | Terms and conditions | Privacy Policy

The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on TheMoneyBlogs.com are provided for personal finance, education and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of TheMoneyBlogs.com and there is no implied endorsement by TheMoneyBlogs.com of any advice or trading strategy. The analysts and employees or affiliates of TheMoneyBlogs.com may hold positions in the stocks or industries discussed here. Your use of this and all information contained on TheMoneyBlogs.com is governed by the Terms and Conditions of Use. Please click the link to view those terms. Follow this link to read our Editorial Policy.

Copyright © 2008 The Connors Group, Inc.