Quantcast THE AP ON THE POVERTY RATE
Search by tag or site Login to my blog ? Start my own blog














TheMoneyBlogs
Home
About
Create your own blog
Contact us
Vote for this blog!

Poor and Stupid

How big government, big business, big media and big academia block your road to financial freedom- and tell you it's for your own good.

THE AP ON THE POVERTY RATE

Posted on 08/29/2006 09:31 AM | Link | Post Comment
Is this journalism, or is this propaganda? The entire wire story:
Poverty Rate Didn't Rise in 2005 For First Time in Five Years

Associated Press
August 29, 2006 10:52 a.m.

WASHINGTON -- The nation's poverty rate was essentially unchanged last year, the first year it hasn't increased since before President Bush took office.

Why not "the first year since the top in the stock market"? Why the presumption that this has anything whatsoever to do with who is in the White House?
The Census Bureau reported Tuesday that 37 million Americans were living under the poverty line last year -- about 12.6% of the population. That is down from 12.7% in 2004, but census officials said the change was statistically insignificant.
If the news had been bad -- that is, if the poverty rate had gone up by the same amount, this disclaimer that the change was insignificant would never have been provided.
The last decline in the poverty rate was in 2000, during the Clinton administration, when it dropped to 11.3%. (Read the full report.)
In case the first reference wasn't clear enough: Bush bad, Clinton good.
The median household income -- the point at which half make more and half make less -- was $46,300, a slight increase from 2004.
More good news -- and more caution that it is insignificant. But why not reveal the base figure so we can judge the change for ourselves?
However, the number of people without health insurance increased to 46.6 million in 2005. About 45.3 million people were without insurance the year before.
Here comes the bad news. Complete with base figure. And no mention that this insignificant change is insignificant.
The official poverty level is used to decide eligibility for federal health, housing, nutrition and child-care benefits. The poverty rate -- the percentage of people living below the poverty line -- helps shape the debate on the health of the nation's economy.

The poverty report comes four years into an uneven economic recovery -- and a little more than two months before congressional midterm elections that will determine whether Republicans continue to control the House and the Senate.

High gas prices and a slowing economy could help make pocketbook issues important in some races, especially in the Midwest, where job growth has been slow or nonexistent. The U.S. added about two million nonfarm jobs in 2005, and has added nearly a million since, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. But job growth has been uneven across the country.

For example, Ohio, Michigan and Illinois had fewer jobs in July than they did when Mr. Bush took office in January 2001. The nation has added 2.8 million jobs in that time, despite suffering job losses in 2001 and 2002.

Why this pastiche of negative economic statistics, culled in space and time specifically to be negative?

"The economy should be an issue," said Evelyn Brodkin, a political scientist at the University of Chicago. "But so much of that depends on who people blame for their economic situation and who they think can help them. We will learn a lot from the midterms."
The "expert" here simply presumes that everything is awful. The only question is whom to blame.
The poverty report also comes 10 years after the 1996 welfare overhaul, which required millions of poor single mothers to work and which set limits on how long recipients could get monthly checks.

Poverty rates didn't skyrocket as some had feared. But they didn't drop much, either, suggesting that many of those who left welfare didn't climb out of poverty. The poverty rate was 13.7% in 1996, when about 4.4 million families received welfare payments. About 1.9 million families receive payments today.

"Most of the people who leave welfare for work are leaving for jobs that pay $7 or $8 an hour," said Joan Entmacher, vice president of the National Women's Law Center, an advocacy group based in Washington. "Under the best of circumstances, they are just getting by."

The second of two "experts" chimes in with the confirming view of how awful everything is. And how did the reporter ever forget to mention that welfare reform was signed into law by President Clinton?
Stock Quote or
Examples
ATM Wallstreet - Mon Oct 06, 2008 03:39PM
Made several great trades today. Traded the QID, QQ [read more]
ATM Wallstreet - Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:07PM
Today we have the Fed speaking and release of Fed mi [read more]
Morpheus Trading - Tue Oct 07, 2008 08:33AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them [read more]

PREMIER SPONSORED LINKS

Most Visited Blogs | Most Popular Blogs | Most Recent Blogs | Contact Us | Terms and conditions | Privacy Policy

The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on TheMoneyBlogs.com are provided for personal finance, education and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of TheMoneyBlogs.com and there is no implied endorsement by TheMoneyBlogs.com of any advice or trading strategy. The analysts and employees or affiliates of TheMoneyBlogs.com may hold positions in the stocks or industries discussed here. Your use of this and all information contained on TheMoneyBlogs.com is governed by the Terms and Conditions of Use. Please click the link to view those terms. Follow this link to read our Editorial Policy.

Copyright © 2008 The Connors Group, Inc.