My Home About Me

Here's a new must-read -- A Farewell to Alms by economic historian Gregory Clark. He shares my skepticism for the superficiality and theoretical sterility of most economic analysis -- and his iconoclastic approach has led him into deeply politically incorrect territory, looking for a genetic basis for economic success and failure. From the Gene Expression blog:

Much of modern economics is entirely theoretical, and even most empirical work in economics involves just looking at very high level correlations between variables such as income per person and education, or democracy, or the openness of trade.

When I set out in my PhD thesis to try and explain differences in income internationally in 1910 I found that asking simple questions like "Why could Indian textile mills not make much profit even though they were in a free trade association with England which had wages five times as high?" led to completely unexpected conclusions. You could show that the standard institutional explanation made no sense when you assembled detailed evidence from trade journals, factory reports, and the accounts of observers. Instead it was the puzzling behavior of the workers inside the factories that was the key...

If, as is possible, the pre-industrial era changed people genetically to be better adapted to market economies, then a systematic comparison of the DNA of societies should find correlations between gene frequencies and the histories of these societies. If genetic change was also occurring in historical time, as opposed to the pre-historic era, then we would expect these changes to be incomplete even in societies with a long history of settled agriculture. In that case we would actually predict class differences genetically! The rich in these societies would differ genetically from the poor in certain systematic ways! All this should be testable at some point.

If the change was purely cultural, then we still might be able to discover systematic behavioral differences between poor and rich in modern capitalist society, such as over time preference rates, that correlate with differences between rich and poor societies...The book challenges the modern orthodoxy of economics - that people are essentially the same everywhere, and with the right set of institutions, growth is inevitable...

Thanks to reader Mark Spahn for the link.

Solar energy ETFs   Technical chart patterns   support/resistance levels   ETFs (exchange traded funds)   Deron Wagner   options   puts   oil   Ideal ETF setups   emini's S&P 500   earnings   economic data   college degree   skilled labor jobs   US economy   SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) chart pattern   Inflation Rate   Inflation Rate vs Dow Performance   Amateur Investors   exchange traded funds