Quantcast Poll Manipulates Social Security Solvency?
Search by tag or site Login to my blog ? Start my own blog














TheMoneyBlogs
Home
About
Create your own blog
Contact us
Vote for this blog!

Poor and Stupid

How big government, big business, big media and big academia block your road to financial freedom- and tell you it's for your own good.

Poll Manipulates Social Security Solvency?

Posted on 01/04/2007 12:28 PM | Link | Post Comment
Social Security reform paranoia seems to be the flavor of the month. Here's a new Harris Poll, reports that "Social Security reform to ensure the Social Security fund has enough money to provide benefits for all Americans for the next 50 years" has the support of 88% of Americans (68% strongly). Sure, well why not? The problem is in the choice of "50 years"? Why 50? Why not forever, or why not the 75 years normally quoted as the definition of actuarial soundness? Actually, when you pick any number of years other than forever you have a conceptual problem. That's because the system is solvent today in the sense that its tax intake is sufficient to cover its benefit outflow. But the more years in the future you look at, the worse it gets, as gradually benefits start to overtake tax revenues. So even today, with no reform, 50 years looks better than the usual 75 years. Okay, so why would the Harris pollsters ask people about the relatively rosy (but still problematic) 50-year horizon, instead of the relatively dark (in fact, very problematic) 75-year horizon that is the standard way of looking at it? Could Harris have been tipped by Democratic staffers? Could this be a "trial balloon" floated by Democrats to try to legislate away the optics of the problem by instructing the Social Security actuaries to start thinking in terms of 50 instead of 75 years? A friend with the right connections tells me he asked the Harris people, and they claim the choice of 50 was entirely arbitrary... but you can't be too careful nowadays.

The reality is that both 50 years and 75 years look horrible. Benefit payments exceed tax intake after 2017, and from that point on the system has to redeem the "assets" of the so-called "trust fund" -- assets that are, in fact, just government debt owed to itself, without any actual wealth being stored to back eventual repayment. Hey, that gives me an idea. Let's pass a law mandating examining solvency on a 10-year basis. That will solve all our problems!

Stock Quote or
Examples
ATM Wallstreet - Mon Oct 06, 2008 03:39PM
Made several great trades today. Traded the QID, QQ [read more]
ATM Wallstreet - Sat Oct 04, 2008 10:41PM
When I first started Day Trading I traded anything that [read more]
ATM Wallstreet - Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:07PM
Today we have the Fed speaking and release of Fed mi [read more]

PREMIER SPONSORED LINKS

Most Visited Blogs | Most Popular Blogs | Most Recent Blogs | Contact Us | Terms and conditions | Privacy Policy

The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on TheMoneyBlogs.com are provided for personal finance, education and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of TheMoneyBlogs.com and there is no implied endorsement by TheMoneyBlogs.com of any advice or trading strategy. The analysts and employees or affiliates of TheMoneyBlogs.com may hold positions in the stocks or industries discussed here. Your use of this and all information contained on TheMoneyBlogs.com is governed by the Terms and Conditions of Use. Please click the link to view those terms. Follow this link to read our Editorial Policy.

Copyright © 2008 The Connors Group, Inc.