| Search by tag or site | Login to my blog ? Start my own blog |
![]() |
Poor and StupidHow big government, big business, big media and big academia block your road to financial freedom- and tell you it's for your own good. |
Aarp Is Back, Messing Up The Social Security Debate Again
Posted on 02/21/2007 23:35 PM | Link | Post Comment
Oh, yes, AARP is such a friend of Social Security reform. The self-serving organization that did more than any other in 2005 to poison sentiment on reform is now says "they will push hard to revamp Social Security to maintain the social insurance program?s solvency and fiscal health." But here's how they'll do it -- with C%3A%5CDocuments%20and%20Settings%5CDonald%20L.%20Luskin%5CDesktop%5C20070220aarp.doc>a bogus push-poll designed to take the idea of personal invesment accounts off the table.
How do you like this? Every potential reform other than personal accounts is presented as something that could help. Personal accounts get "pro" and "con" arguments, both salted with negative editorial commentary. The "con" version says: "I do not think that is a good idea if it will cost the federal government nearly $1 trillion (depending on the plan) for the first ten years and more after that..." The "pro" version says "Even though it could cost the federal government nearly $1 trillion dollars for the first 10 years and even more than that to set up..." The truth is that personal accounts wouldn't cost anybody anything beyond the commitments the existing system has already made -- they just make today's costs explicit, rather than allowing them to remain hidden in Enron-type off-balance sheet accounting. And when it comes to "add-on" accounts, there is no mention at all that "add-on" accounts and "auto-IRA" accounts, unlike the proposed personal accounts, would be a totally additional out-of-pocket outlay from workers, and would do nothing to pre-fund current Social Security obligations or to reduce cost burdens on future generations.
Every word is calculated to favor tax increases, and disfavor the realistic reining in of programmed benefit growth. Look at question R10: "Do you preter 'benefit cuts' or 'revenue enhancements'?" No mention that only a deceleration of benefit growth is required to stabilize the systen, not outright cuts. Meanwhile, tax increases masquerade as "revenue enhancements."
I'm sure glad that when I get old and feeble-minded this classy organization will be looking out for me -- and figuring out how to screw all the young people in America for my benefit, with whatever lies it takes.
- Recession? Hell No, We're In A Depression
- Accountability? Not For The Inheritor
- Those Hard-working Ceo's
- Cracked!
- It's My Day To Get Quoted!
- Nov 2007
- Oct 2007
- Sep 2007
- Aug 2007
- Jul 2007
- Jun 2007
- May 2007
- Apr 2007
- Mar 2007
- Feb 2007
- Jan 2007
- Dec 2006
- Nov 2006
- Oct 2006
- Sep 2006
- Aug 2006
- Jul 2006
- Jun 2006
![]()
Examples
ATM Wallstreet - Mon Oct 06, 2008 03:39PM
Made several great trades today. Traded the QID, QQ [read more]
Made several great trades today. Traded the QID, QQ [read more]
ATM Wallstreet - Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:07PM
Today we have the Fed speaking and release of Fed mi [read more]
Today we have the Fed speaking and release of Fed mi [read more]
Morpheus Trading - Tue Oct 07, 2008 08:33AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them [read more]
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them [read more]












<< My Home | TheMoneyBlogs Home