Quantcast Stocks Vs. Real Estate: "YAWN" - Follow-up
Search by tag or site Login to my blog ? Start my own blog














TheMoneyBlogs
Home
About
Create your own blog
Contact us
Vote for this blog!

Millionaire Now! by Larry Nusbaum

This blog is based on the organizational principles found in my new book, "Millionaire Now! - A Financial Toolbox with Seven Steps to Wealth".

Stocks Vs. Real Estate: "YAWN" - Follow-up

Posted on 04/25/2007 07:57:44 | Link | Post Comment

 AS A REFRESHER: Stocks vs. Real Estate: "YAWN"

Some additional thoughts:

The S&P 500 index is something that no one buys and keeps. Two of the best known stock investors in the country are William O'Neil and Warren Buffett. They would never buy any index. O'Neil buys 4-5 stocks and Buffett around 20.

The stock market(s) are national or international markets. Not so with real estate (housing). They are local markets only. So, it's like asking, "is it faster to N.Y. or by bus?"

So, on that basis, does a commercial RE investor in L.A. care what the Denver condo market is doing? No. But, a stock investor must always worry about the right time and/or right sector of the market to be in.

READ: Get A Grip - On a Real Market not a Trading Environment

In 2005, the Phoenix housing market returned a stunning average appreciation of 46%.
Point. Set. Match.

The SPX is at 1480.93. I can buy it today, with cash, hold it and get religious: start praying. I get no discount.

There is no reason why I can't buy real estate at huge discounts from the outset, take the property to a higher use and beat my market's averages routinely....and I do. Can't be done with public equities. After you buy, the price will move up or down despite your prayers.

The public trusts property because of it steady record since 1930 and low volatility. Not true with stocks.

With stocks, strict sell disciplines must be in place. With real estate you need strict buy disciplines.

Please keep another point in mind when analyzing stock returns over time: According to the Frank Russell and Co, the “manager of managers”, the S&P 500 (10.2%) and the average fund manager (12.2%) has outperformed the average investor (2.7%) over the past 30 years. Why? Because, individuals who handle their own accounts tend to make too many moves and at the wrong time greatly retarding long-term performance. The point being that unless you own managed funds or index funds, you will not achieve any where close to the returns used in research reports comparing stock market returns to other asset class returns over a long period of time.

Housing Bubble and Real Estate Market Tracker from SA for 4/24

other news:

Stock Quote or
Examples
ATM Wallstreet - Mon Oct 06, 2008 03:39PM
Made several great trades today. Traded the QID, QQ [read more]
ATM Wallstreet - Sat Oct 04, 2008 10:41PM
When I first started Day Trading I traded anything that [read more]
LearningMarkets.com - Fri Oct 03, 2008 03:14PM
Written by S. Wade Hansen Why Should You Care About O [read more]

PREMIER SPONSORED LINKS

Most Visited Blogs | Most Popular Blogs | Most Recent Blogs | Contact Us | Terms and conditions | Privacy Policy

The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on TheMoneyBlogs.com are provided for personal finance, education and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of TheMoneyBlogs.com and there is no implied endorsement by TheMoneyBlogs.com of any advice or trading strategy. The analysts and employees or affiliates of TheMoneyBlogs.com may hold positions in the stocks or industries discussed here. Your use of this and all information contained on TheMoneyBlogs.com is governed by the Terms and Conditions of Use. Please click the link to view those terms. Follow this link to read our Editorial Policy.

Copyright © 2008 The Connors Group, Inc.