| Search by tag or site | Login to my blog ▪ Start my own blog |
Financial SkepticAccentuating the caveat emptor with critical commentary concerning investor relations and financial communications. I look at how information is (mis)managed and manipulated thereby creating possible investors losses. |
Value Line Shares Forecast Market
Posted on 12/18/2006 06:26 AM | Link | Post Comment
Value Line, Inc. (NASDAQ:VALU - News) reported Q2 results and net income was up 10% from the comparable Q2 last year. Can Value Line be used as a market forecast proxy or do you actually have to buy the services. The main revenue growth driver was licensing fees up 75% for the comparable periods, albeit the growth was based on smallish but optimistic product offerings. No management comment about future growth was offered.
But the old mainstay of periodicals and publications revenues was down 5% and related expenses down 4% with the resulting margin squeeze. Value Line also claims to have spent more money (up a whopping 16%) on marketing campaigns and fees to third parties to drive in more business. These campaigns are usually targeted at the individual investor. The campaigns did not seem to work.
Within the electronic publishing category, revenues were flat and paper revenues declined in keeping with all the usual experiences of North American Media. Retail subscribers were down but institutional investor subscription growth offset.
Mark Hulbert (you should know who he is) recently commented “Perhaps the most widely known of these newsletters is the Value Line Investment Survey, which is one of the best-performing of any of the newsletters tracked by the Hulbert Financial Digest over the past three decades....This newsletter has not made any recommendation in its model portfolios since early October, and in the months before that it dramatically cut back on the number of transactions it recommended. This represented a big shift, because in prior years the newsletter's model portfolios were quite actively traded.”
Could it be that the action addicted investor category now finds Value Line advice boring and is changing to more adrenaline pumped advisories? Institutions hopefully are less frenetic and therefore value intellectually honest analysis and opinions.
Could it also be that the market is similar to a roller-coaster ride? We are the top of a very large rise and just cannot figure out what the next sequence will be. If the newsletter is good at predicting and cannot identify something to buy that’s bad for the market. If the newsletter is good at predicting and cannot identify anything to sell that’s good for the market.
Therefore has Value Line issued a market neutral signal.
But the old mainstay of periodicals and publications revenues was down 5% and related expenses down 4% with the resulting margin squeeze. Value Line also claims to have spent more money (up a whopping 16%) on marketing campaigns and fees to third parties to drive in more business. These campaigns are usually targeted at the individual investor. The campaigns did not seem to work.
Within the electronic publishing category, revenues were flat and paper revenues declined in keeping with all the usual experiences of North American Media. Retail subscribers were down but institutional investor subscription growth offset.
Mark Hulbert (you should know who he is) recently commented “Perhaps the most widely known of these newsletters is the Value Line Investment Survey, which is one of the best-performing of any of the newsletters tracked by the Hulbert Financial Digest over the past three decades....This newsletter has not made any recommendation in its model portfolios since early October, and in the months before that it dramatically cut back on the number of transactions it recommended. This represented a big shift, because in prior years the newsletter's model portfolios were quite actively traded.”
Could it be that the action addicted investor category now finds Value Line advice boring and is changing to more adrenaline pumped advisories? Institutions hopefully are less frenetic and therefore value intellectually honest analysis and opinions.
Could it also be that the market is similar to a roller-coaster ride? We are the top of a very large rise and just cannot figure out what the next sequence will be. If the newsletter is good at predicting and cannot identify something to buy that’s bad for the market. If the newsletter is good at predicting and cannot identify anything to sell that’s good for the market.
Therefore has Value Line issued a market neutral signal.
- Countrywide: Time To Look At The Board
- Gm Veba; Investors Need To Pay Attention
- Axa Research What Is This?
- Ldk Encircled By Wolves
- Bain Submits To Foreign Security Review But Will Investors Benefit
- Oct 2007
- Sep 2007
- Aug 2007
- Jul 2007
- Jun 2007
- May 2007
- Apr 2007
- Mar 2007
- Feb 2007
- Jan 2007
- Dec 2006
- Nov 2006
- Oct 2006
- Sep 2006
- Aug 2006
- Jul 2006
![]()
Examples
Morpheus Trading - Thu Jul 17, 2008 01:15AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if th [read more]
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if th [read more]
Morpheus Trading - Tue Jul 15, 2008 08:25AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them [read more]
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them [read more]
Morpheus Trading - Mon Jul 14, 2008 02:18AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if [read more]
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if [read more]












<< My Home | TheMoneyBlogs Home