Quantcast Teamster Nibble at FedEx. The New Reality?
Search by tag or site Login to my blogStart my own blog















TheMoneyBlogs
Home
About
Create your own blog
Contact us
Vote for this blog!

Financial Skeptic

Accentuating the caveat emptor with critical commentary concerning investor relations and financial communications. I look at how information is (mis)managed and manipulated thereby creating possible investors losses.

Teamster Nibble at FedEx. The New Reality?

Posted on 11/20/2006 00:00 AM | Link | Post Comment
FedEx Corp. (FDX) drivers at two distribution centers in Wilmington, Massachusetts, voted by a margin of 3 to 1 to seek representation by the Teamsters. Management immediately announced that they will be challenging the vote.

The Teamsters represent drivers in UPS and the US Postal System has their own union. FedEx has maintained that many of these drivers are independent contractors. Recent court decisions have ruled against management assertions.

The certification appears to be small for the time being. Only about 32 drivers operate from these two locations. FedEx has approximately 15,000 truckers. Can FedEx ship around them and/or fire them somehow? Probably and maybe. Will this fuel further militancy if management gets rough? Certainly. Casual conversations with FedEx drivers indicate there is substantial sympathy for signing on with the union. Management has been throwing the drivers little bones along the way such as lifting the prohibition on facial hair. The little moves have only whet the drivers appetite as they start to feel power and entitlement.

FedEx and the teamsters know they need to organize FedEx. Then they will be able to negotiate with the industry much the same way as the United Auto WorkerÂ&146;s negotiated when they were more important then they are now. The teamsters now represent approximately 1.4 men and women, including workers at UPS, UPS Freight and DHL.

The teamsters are looking at FedEx's profits of $1.8 Billion for last fiscal year and $475 during Q1. FedEx stock is trading at close to its upper 52-week range.

Here is the arithmetic. Assuming all 15,000 workers are full time equivalent and draw 40 hours per week for 52 weeks a year. Assume the new contract costs an extra $5 per hour in salary and benefits, the bottom line takes a hit of approximately a $156 million dollar, which is less than 10% of last years earnings. Not good news but not strategically disastrous if the competition is faced with the same circumstances.

The union may take around two years to organize the entire FedEx system. Watch for labor disruptions. If FedEx were smart they may enter into a profit sharing arrangement to keep the cost variable.
Stock Quote or
Examples
Morpheus Trading - Thu Jul 17, 2008 01:15AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if th [read more]
Morpheus Trading - Tue Jul 15, 2008 08:25AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them [read more]
Morpheus Trading - Mon Jul 14, 2008 02:18AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if [read more]

PREMIER SPONSORED LINKS

Most Visited Blogs | Most Popular Blogs | Most Recent Blogs | Contact Us | Terms and conditions | Privacy Policy

The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on TheMoneyBlogs.com are provided for personal finance, education and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of TheMoneyBlogs.com and there is no implied endorsement by TheMoneyBlogs.com of any advice or trading strategy. The analysts and employees or affiliates of TheMoneyBlogs.com may hold positions in the stocks or industries discussed here. Your use of this and all information contained on TheMoneyBlogs.com is governed by the Terms and Conditions of Use. Please click the link to view those terms. Follow this link to read our Editorial Policy.

Copyright © 2008 The Connors Group, Inc.