| Search by tag or site | Login to my blog ▪ Start my own blog |
Financial SkepticAccentuating the caveat emptor with critical commentary concerning investor relations and financial communications. I look at how information is (mis)managed and manipulated thereby creating possible investors losses. |
Open Letter to SEC About Dividend Announcements
Posted on 10/31/2006 00:00 AM | Link | Post Comment
Open Question to SEC
Does declaring a dividend before an earnings announcement constitute an implied but ambiguous form of disclosure?
Rationale
Dividends are typically paid from net earnings. Usually corporate directors adopt a dividend pay out policy, which is predicated upon the boards view of earnings. Consistent and or consistently increasing dividends are viewed as excellent indicators of corporate financial health making ownership that much more desirable. Therefore dividends as declared quarterly are an implicit form of guidance emanating from the Board of Directors.
Senior executives author official guidance and management comments contained within earnings releases, guidance statements as well as conference calls. The board may have been consulted or informed but responsibility lies with the senior officers. I do not believe that we have ever heard that there is a board buy in. Senior officers may speak to the dividend policy and dividend coverage and earnings payout ratio’s but it is ultimately the board’s responsibility to approve or not approve all dividends.
Several conundrums appear. A company may declare a dividend and then release poor and surprising results. Investors will feel ambushed, as they have found that they may no longer rely on the dividend as an indicator of financial health. At the other end of the scale a dividend may be declared followed by superior results and a possibility of long-term improvement, which had not been previously anticipated. The investor who relied on the dividend would not have had sufficient financial information. Various investor toxic scenarios may be constructed.
If dividends are declared and announced separately from earnings results an arbitrage opportunity develops. Cash is fact and everything else is an opinion. Dividends are cold hard cash.
My suggestion is to require that all dividends be declared and announced at the same time as the quarterly earnings report. The board reviews the quarterly financials and is then in the best position to decide the dividend. By announcing earnings and declaring dividends in one consolidated announcement you integrate board with management responsibilities thereby improving accountability to the investor while reducing governance risk.
Does declaring a dividend before an earnings announcement constitute an implied but ambiguous form of disclosure?
Rationale
Dividends are typically paid from net earnings. Usually corporate directors adopt a dividend pay out policy, which is predicated upon the boards view of earnings. Consistent and or consistently increasing dividends are viewed as excellent indicators of corporate financial health making ownership that much more desirable. Therefore dividends as declared quarterly are an implicit form of guidance emanating from the Board of Directors.
Senior executives author official guidance and management comments contained within earnings releases, guidance statements as well as conference calls. The board may have been consulted or informed but responsibility lies with the senior officers. I do not believe that we have ever heard that there is a board buy in. Senior officers may speak to the dividend policy and dividend coverage and earnings payout ratio’s but it is ultimately the board’s responsibility to approve or not approve all dividends.
Several conundrums appear. A company may declare a dividend and then release poor and surprising results. Investors will feel ambushed, as they have found that they may no longer rely on the dividend as an indicator of financial health. At the other end of the scale a dividend may be declared followed by superior results and a possibility of long-term improvement, which had not been previously anticipated. The investor who relied on the dividend would not have had sufficient financial information. Various investor toxic scenarios may be constructed.
If dividends are declared and announced separately from earnings results an arbitrage opportunity develops. Cash is fact and everything else is an opinion. Dividends are cold hard cash.
My suggestion is to require that all dividends be declared and announced at the same time as the quarterly earnings report. The board reviews the quarterly financials and is then in the best position to decide the dividend. By announcing earnings and declaring dividends in one consolidated announcement you integrate board with management responsibilities thereby improving accountability to the investor while reducing governance risk.
- Countrywide: Time To Look At The Board
- Gm Veba; Investors Need To Pay Attention
- Axa Research What Is This?
- Ldk Encircled By Wolves
- Bain Submits To Foreign Security Review But Will Investors Benefit
- Oct 2007
- Sep 2007
- Aug 2007
- Jul 2007
- Jun 2007
- May 2007
- Apr 2007
- Mar 2007
- Feb 2007
- Jan 2007
- Dec 2006
- Nov 2006
- Oct 2006
- Sep 2006
- Aug 2006
- Jul 2006
![]()
- Credit Bloggers
- The Technical Trader
- Wishing Wealth
- Financial Skeptic
- Don't Mess With Taxes
- Poor and Stupid
Examples
ATM Wallstreet - Mon Oct 06, 2008 03:39PM
Made several great trades today. Traded the QID, QQ [read more]
Made several great trades today. Traded the QID, QQ [read more]
ATM Wallstreet - Sat Oct 04, 2008 10:41PM
When I first started Day Trading I traded anything that [read more]
When I first started Day Trading I traded anything that [read more]
ATM Wallstreet - Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:07PM
Today we have the Fed speaking and release of Fed mi [read more]
Today we have the Fed speaking and release of Fed mi [read more]












<< My Home | TheMoneyBlogs Home