| Search by tag or site | Login to my blog ▪ Start my own blog |
Financial SkepticAccentuating the caveat emptor with critical commentary concerning investor relations and financial communications. I look at how information is (mis)managed and manipulated thereby creating possible investors losses. |
Bank Of Nova Scotia Gets Bopped By Ci
Posted on 09/28/2007 06:33 AM | Link | Post Comment
Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) is involved in a stutter step style, maybe its going to be a take over, deal. Dundee Wealth (TSX:DW) ran into some trouble with its wholly owned bank as a result of asset securitization that blew up in their face. They needed help. Bank of Nova Scotia steps in and buys out the problem child bank and also buys approximately 20% of Dundee. Not what Ned Goodman had in mind but there was a problem.
The rationale for BNS is excellent. The problem child is small enough and BNS is big enough to allow BNS to hold their nose and gulp the problem down with minimal gag reflex complications. The sugar that made the deal go down was the equity stake in Dundee. BNS is way behind its other rivals in mutual funds, financial advisers and wealth management.
Therefore a foothold into Dundee makes all the strategic sense in the world. Except, to potential competitors; some of whom very much appreciated the fact that BNS was a weak participant in the field.
Enter CI. CI is a corporation controlled by CI Financial Income Fund, an income trust listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol CIX.UN. The CI Financial group of companies had approximately $95.4 billion in fee-earning assets as of Aug 31, 2007.
CI offers a 52% premium. At first the deal was structured with BNS going away. After discussions between Dundee and CI it became apparent that Dundee was contractually obliged to sell the problem bank. This also means that BNS is contractually obliged to buy the problem bank.
CI amends the offer and now has decided that BNS participation is really a very good thing. You can follow the wisdom. CI has just positively established the market valuation for itself by buying a major competitor at a 52% premium. BNS cannot leverage a third party difficulty and reduce shareholder wealth at CI. BNS which has had a reputation of being slow, must now pay a huge premium if it wants more of Dundee or pray tell CI.
BNS incorrectly focused on deal points hoping to capitalize on a problem situation. They did not look around to survey the potential motivations of other market players. BNS cannot steal the asset.
Sometimes you just have to stop and watch a good fist fight.
The rationale for BNS is excellent. The problem child is small enough and BNS is big enough to allow BNS to hold their nose and gulp the problem down with minimal gag reflex complications. The sugar that made the deal go down was the equity stake in Dundee. BNS is way behind its other rivals in mutual funds, financial advisers and wealth management.
Therefore a foothold into Dundee makes all the strategic sense in the world. Except, to potential competitors; some of whom very much appreciated the fact that BNS was a weak participant in the field.
Enter CI. CI is a corporation controlled by CI Financial Income Fund, an income trust listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol CIX.UN. The CI Financial group of companies had approximately $95.4 billion in fee-earning assets as of Aug 31, 2007.
CI offers a 52% premium. At first the deal was structured with BNS going away. After discussions between Dundee and CI it became apparent that Dundee was contractually obliged to sell the problem bank. This also means that BNS is contractually obliged to buy the problem bank.
CI amends the offer and now has decided that BNS participation is really a very good thing. You can follow the wisdom. CI has just positively established the market valuation for itself by buying a major competitor at a 52% premium. BNS cannot leverage a third party difficulty and reduce shareholder wealth at CI. BNS which has had a reputation of being slow, must now pay a huge premium if it wants more of Dundee or pray tell CI.
BNS incorrectly focused on deal points hoping to capitalize on a problem situation. They did not look around to survey the potential motivations of other market players. BNS cannot steal the asset.
Sometimes you just have to stop and watch a good fist fight.
- Countrywide: Time To Look At The Board
- Gm Veba; Investors Need To Pay Attention
- Axa Research What Is This?
- Ldk Encircled By Wolves
- Bain Submits To Foreign Security Review But Will Investors Benefit
- Oct 2007
- Sep 2007
- Aug 2007
- Jul 2007
- Jun 2007
- May 2007
- Apr 2007
- Mar 2007
- Feb 2007
- Jan 2007
- Dec 2006
- Nov 2006
- Oct 2006
- Sep 2006
- Aug 2006
- Jul 2006
![]()
Examples
ATM Wallstreet - Mon Oct 06, 2008 03:39PM
Made several great trades today. Traded the QID, QQ [read more]
Made several great trades today. Traded the QID, QQ [read more]
ATM Wallstreet - Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:07PM
Today we have the Fed speaking and release of Fed mi [read more]
Today we have the Fed speaking and release of Fed mi [read more]
Morpheus Trading - Tue Oct 07, 2008 08:33AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them [read more]
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them [read more]












<< My Home | TheMoneyBlogs Home