Quantcast Are Pharma Companies Investable?
Search by tag or site Login to my blogStart my own blog















TheMoneyBlogs
Home
About
Create your own blog
Contact us
Vote for this blog!

Financial Skeptic

Accentuating the caveat emptor with critical commentary concerning investor relations and financial communications. I look at how information is (mis)managed and manipulated thereby creating possible investors losses.

Are Pharma Companies Investable?

Posted on 07/30/2007 15:26:21 | Link | Post Comment
Can investors continue considering pharmaceuticals suitable for investment? Consider the pharma ETF (AMEX:PPH) A one year hold takes you from $75 to $78 approximately. Thanks a lot! Longer term holds are more lamentable.

Most pharmaceutical companies continue to lay eggs one way or the other. Perhaps with the exception of Bristol Myers (NYSE:BMY) and Schering Plough (NYSE:SGP) most companies cannot keep producing new drugs into the market and then come up with adequate defences against patent expirations, lawsuits, intellectual infringements, FDA dis-approvals and the ever popular re-structuring where the company offers to consume vital body parts in desperate bids to shore up short term valuations.

The investor is more than skeptical. The question has become why bother holding this asset class? Today’s good news turns around and bites you tomorrow. Investors cannot wait for industry fundamentals to swing around such as with home builders or other cyclicals. Pharmaceutical fundamentals are death and disease, perhaps two of the most constant and compelling problems known to mankind. These drivers should adequately produce positive financial results but have proven fickle.

Larger pharmaceutical companies are amalgams of success and failure seasoned with product life cycle problems. The failures overwhelm the successes. Is it time to reconsider how we hold wealth in this volatile business?

I am looking for a corporate structure where one drug or therapy is placed into one say partnership structure with tradeable units. Each partnership will have an identifiable business. Investors may reach their own conclusions buying selling or holding. Third party companies may be involved in the overall corporate management structures. Similar to REITS.

I doubt if the current tax advantage for partnership units will hold politically. So anyone’s analysis should include a full tax load. But with all the necessary R&D some of the marginal rates may prove attractive.

By spinning off the units you allow value to be unlocked. The value would be naked and identifiable. The business unit becomes more accountable to the marketplace and investors are able to make case by case decisions. This replaces the current method of buying a blind pig in the poke which is what most pharmaceuticals companies are becoming.
Stock Quote or
Examples
ATM Wallstreet - Mon Oct 06, 2008 03:39PM
Made several great trades today. Traded the QID, QQ [read more]
ATM Wallstreet - Sat Oct 04, 2008 10:41PM
When I first started Day Trading I traded anything that [read more]
ATM Wallstreet - Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:07PM
Today we have the Fed speaking and release of Fed mi [read more]

PREMIER SPONSORED LINKS

Most Visited Blogs | Most Popular Blogs | Most Recent Blogs | Contact Us | Terms and conditions | Privacy Policy

The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on TheMoneyBlogs.com are provided for personal finance, education and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of TheMoneyBlogs.com and there is no implied endorsement by TheMoneyBlogs.com of any advice or trading strategy. The analysts and employees or affiliates of TheMoneyBlogs.com may hold positions in the stocks or industries discussed here. Your use of this and all information contained on TheMoneyBlogs.com is governed by the Terms and Conditions of Use. Please click the link to view those terms. Follow this link to read our Editorial Policy.

Copyright © 2008 The Connors Group, Inc.