Quantcast Tax Cheat Rap Sheet: <br>week Ending June 1, 2007</br>
Search by tag or site Login to my blog ? Start my own blog














TheMoneyBlogs
Home
About
Create your own blog
Contact us
Vote for this blog!

Don't Mess With Taxes

Taxes. Sure you hate 'em, but you're stuck with 'em. Either that, or you're stuck in a federal jail cell. We'll make your tax tasks less, well, taxing, and help cure your personal finance ills with regular dosesof money news, notices, tips, commentary, insight and humor, courtesy of Texas journalist Kay Bell.

Tax Cheat Rap Sheet:
week Ending June 1, 2007

Posted on 06/04/2007 07:55:07 | Link | Post Comment

For this week's look at tax cheats, we're going with just two cases because this weekend has turned out to be just as overloaded as Monday through Friday was.

But I think you'll find each instance ranks quite high in the &quot;you've got to be kidding&quot; category.

First, we have another big accounting firm involved with bogus tax shelters, a la KPMG and Jenkens &amp; Gilchrist. So what, you say?

Here's what: Federal prosecutors say one of the illegal shelters devised by Ernst &amp; Young employees used the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks as the basis to cheat the government of hundreds of millions of tax dollars.

Martin Nissenbaum, Richard Shapiro, Robert Coplan and Brian Vaughan were indicted by a New York-based federal grand jury last week. They allegedly set up illegal shelters for E&amp;Y clients with taxable income generally in excess of $10-to-$20 million in order to eliminate or reduce federal taxes.

Prosecutors say the employees, two of whom no longer work for E&amp;Y, created &quot;false and fraudulent factual scenarios&quot; such as the World Trade Center attacks, which sent the value of investments plunging.

After obtaining the shelters' tax benefits, according to the indictment, some of the clients terminated their trading partnerships using a letter devised by one of the defendants in which &quot;clients falsely attributed their decision to discontinue their trading activities to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and to 'possible economic repercussions resulting from such attacks.'&quot;

Not that you expect decorum and class when it comes to tax cheating, but using 9/11 is particularly distasteful.

'Poor pitiful me:' For our second tax crime this week, we turn to a Florida woman who finally has to pay, sort of, for stiffing Uncle Sam of more than $3 million.

Mary Ham was convicted in January, along with her boyfriend, for refusing to pay $3.6 million in taxes, interest and penalties. Last week, she was sentenced to two years in federal prison. That was less than half the recommended jail time.

Apparently, the judge bought Ham's tearful argument that she &quot;allowed dominant men in [her] life to be in control.&quot; Yeah, that and dominant greed.

Ham and her co-defendant in the case, Fred Suttles, owned Diamond Brokers of Northwest Florida. He also is the father of her younger daughter. In April, the same judge sentenced Suttles to 14 years.

At least Ham also got three years of supervised release after her prison term and was fined a &lt;cough&gt; whopping &lt;cough&gt; $10,000.

Stock Quote or
Examples
Editorial Spotlight - Fri Aug 15, 2008 10:33AM
They say the most dangerous enemy is the one you don’ [read more]
Editorial Spotlight - Tue Aug 19, 2008 05:27PM
College, they say, provides the best return of any inves [read more]
Morpheus Trading - Tue Aug 19, 2008 02:19AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if [read more]

PREMIER SPONSORED LINKS

Most Visited Blogs | Most Popular Blogs | Most Recent Blogs | Contact Us | Terms and conditions | Privacy Policy

The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on TheMoneyBlogs.com are provided for personal finance, education and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of TheMoneyBlogs.com and there is no implied endorsement by TheMoneyBlogs.com of any advice or trading strategy. The analysts and employees or affiliates of TheMoneyBlogs.com may hold positions in the stocks or industries discussed here. Your use of this and all information contained on TheMoneyBlogs.com is governed by the Terms and Conditions of Use. Please click the link to view those terms. Follow this link to read our Editorial Policy.

Copyright © 2008 The Connors Group, Inc.