Quantcast Bill Nygren: Questions And Answers At Gurufocus
Search by or site Login to my blogStart my own blog















TheMoneyBlogs
Home
About
Create your own blog
Contact us
Vote for this blog!

Dah Hui Lau (David)

Knowledge grows through sharing! To be the best, learn from the best! May all your dreams come true!

Bill Nygren: Questions And Answers At Gurufocus

Posted on 08/12/2007 07:26:06 | Link | Post Comment
1. Bill, I understand that you sell when the price of the stock reaches 90% of your estimate of its intrinsic value. Have there been any exceptions? On average, have you found this to be an optimal sell strategy?


Bill Nygren: Four exceptions:

  • We sell at less than 90% of value if we lose confidence in either the management or the ability of the business to grow. Effectively, those are sales of our mistakes.

  • We sell at less than 90% of value if the business needs to be owned by someone else to maximize value (generally meaning acquisition synergy) and there is no reason to believe such a change in ownership is imminent.

  • We will sell at less than 90% of value if non-owned stocks are available at less than 60% of value. The relative gap of 40-50% appreciation is what we are really trying to capture.

  • We will wait for a holding to go long term if it is selling at around 90%-110% of our value estimate. If it increases past that, we’ll accept the short term tax penalty to avoid the risk of holding a significantly overvalued security.

  • Importantly, there is no magic in using 90%. For us, it seems to be about the right percentage to allow us to be generally fully invested, create reasonable turnover, and not create false precision in our estimates.

    2. I presume that a buyer of a whole business is willing to pay a premium for control. How much is this premium, typically? Is this premium the reason you as a non-control owner sell at 90% rather than 100% of fair value?

    Bill Nygren: When I started in the business, control premiums were quite high, because in many cases, businesses weren’t being run to maximize value for the shareholders. Buyers, therefore, were willing to pay a high premium for control because they were going to radically change how the business was being managed. Today, I believe most businesses are already being run to maximize their value and buyers don’t bring much to the table, other than a willingness to use more financial leverage, so premiums are smaller. I don’t have a guess at a typical control premium. In general, I believe it is highest when a corporate buyer has synergy opportunities.



    Full Article
    Stock Quote or
    Examples
    ATM Wallstreet - Mon Oct 06, 2008 03:39PM
    Made several great trades today. Traded the QID, QQ [read more]
    ATM Wallstreet - Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:07PM
    Today we have the Fed speaking and release of Fed mi [read more]
    Morpheus Trading - Tue Oct 07, 2008 08:33AM
    NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them [read more]

    PREMIER SPONSORED LINKS

    Most Visited Blogs | Most Popular Blogs | Most Recent Blogs | Contact Us | Terms and conditions | Privacy Policy

    The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on TheMoneyBlogs.com are provided for personal finance, education and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of TheMoneyBlogs.com and there is no implied endorsement by TheMoneyBlogs.com of any advice or trading strategy. The analysts and employees or affiliates of TheMoneyBlogs.com may hold positions in the stocks or industries discussed here. Your use of this and all information contained on TheMoneyBlogs.com is governed by the Terms and Conditions of Use. Please click the link to view those terms. Follow this link to read our Editorial Policy.

    Copyright © 2008 The Connors Group, Inc.