Quantcast So High Taxes Are Good For Me?
Search by tag or site Login to my blog ? Start my own blog














TheMoneyBlogs
Home
About
Create your own blog
Contact us
Vote for this blog!

Canajun Finances

My personal views and rants on home finances with a Canadian Perspective

So High Taxes Are Good For Me?

Posted on 12/06/2006 00:00 AM | Link | Post Comment
So when you ask a "think tank" whether high taxes are good or not, what do you think the answer you might get? Well if you ask the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, you get the answer that Higher Taxes are what makes your country great (I paraphrase, but essentially their report says that higher taxes are a good thing).

This report compares countries with high tax rates and low tax rates and then rates the quality of life (effectively) in these countries. The CCPA claims to be a "... non-partisan research institute ...", but certainly not unbiased. Their point of view is very much a Social Democratic point of view, that the government must take care of it's population, and the only way possible is via taxes.

While my viewpoint agrees that the state must at least ensure a minimum lifestyle for all folks, I am not sure it needs to go to the levels that are seen in Sweden or Finland either (which is evidently Utopia, by this research).

Our findings show Americans bear incredibly
severe social costs for living in one of the lowest taxed
countries in the world.

Which is interesting, it mostly says that the U.S.'s medical system and social safety net are not very good (which I might agree with in some instances). The report implies that Canada should not be trying to emulate the U.S. "low tax" viewpoint, but should move towards the model of the Nordic countries (higher taxes, much larger state run social welfare programs). Specifically:

  • Nordic countries have significantly lower rates of poverty across almost all social groups;
  • as an indicator of how well a country protects the vulnerable, the elderly have significantly higher pension income replacement rates in Nordic countries and the income received by those with disabilities relative to the population is much higher;
  • income is distributed significantly more equally in Nordic countries;

This seems to be the crux of the argument, is that there should not be small groups with wealth and large groups without. A noble idea, I don't agree with it, because you choke off the parochial traditions of "work hard and be rewarded" that most of us grew up with.

If I didn't have to work hard to get rewarded, would I? That's a very good question.

An interesting read, well worth spending a half hour reading it and seeing what you think about the topics discussed. -C8j
Stock Quote or
Examples
ATM Wallstreet - Tue Jul 08, 2008 02:28PM
Why I traded the stock ME today. I had it on my list fr [read more]
Morpheus Trading - Wed Jul 02, 2008 08:45AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if [read more]
Morpheus Trading - Thu Jul 03, 2008 07:49AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if [read more]

PREMIER SPONSORED LINKS

Most Visited Blogs | Most Popular Blogs | Most Recent Blogs | Contact Us | Terms and conditions | Privacy Policy

The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on TheMoneyBlogs.com are provided for personal finance, education and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of TheMoneyBlogs.com and there is no implied endorsement by TheMoneyBlogs.com of any advice or trading strategy. The analysts and employees or affiliates of TheMoneyBlogs.com may hold positions in the stocks or industries discussed here. Your use of this and all information contained on TheMoneyBlogs.com is governed by the Terms and Conditions of Use. Please click the link to view those terms. Follow this link to read our Editorial Policy.

Copyright © 2008 The Connors Group, Inc.