| Search by tag or site | Login to my blog ▪ Start my own blog |
![]() |
The Boston Real Estate BlogI am an independent real estate broker, focused on the residential real estate market in downtown Boston. |
Whoops … Northpoint Condos To Be Torn Down?
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court threw doubt on the legal status of multiple building projects when it ruled the NorthPoint complex in Cambridge is not exempt from certain state environmental regulations governing waterways.
The decision reverses a lower court judge who determined that a provision of regulations adopted in 1990 exempted NorthPoint and other projects from state law covering where and how buildings can be developed on and near state harborlands.
The provision was also applied to the 22-acre site on the South Boston waterfront being developed by John B. Hynes II and other land in the Back Bay, some of which has already been built on. Jones Lang LaSalle, development managers of NorthPoint, had no comment.
Oh, I'm sure they had a comment! Something along the lines of, "Holy fucking shit."
Source: Mass. Supreme Court rules on building near wetlands (3rd story) - By Thomas C. Palmer Jr., The Boston Globe
More posts about: new developments and projectsnew developments and projects
- Where Small People Fear To Tread …
- Looking For Real Estate Agents / Bloggers
- Boston Residential Real Estate Condo Sales, October 6, 2007
- Us Gained Jobs In August & September … Did You Expect Otherwise?
- Mousy, Mousy, Mousy: City Of Boston Most At Risk For Rodent Infestation
- Oct 2007
- Sep 2007
- Aug 2007
- Jul 2007
- Jun 2007
- May 2007
- Apr 2007
- Mar 2007
- Feb 2007
- Jan 2007
- Dec 2006
- Nov 2006
- Oct 2006
- Sep 2006
![]()
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if th [read more]
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them [read more]
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if [read more]













2 Comments:
Regarding that MA Supreme Court decision concerning NorthPoint not being exempt from environmental regulations, does anyone know the name of the case where that decision came down???
Moot v. DEP (SJC-09774)
<< My Home | TheMoneyBlogs Home