Quantcast Who's In Favor Of Safer Drugs?
Search by tag or site Login to my blog ? Start my own blog














TheMoneyBlogs
Home
About
Create your own blog
Contact us
Vote for this blog!

BioHealth Investor

BioHealth Investor (BHI) is a blog and journal focused on providing updated commentary and financial news from the biotech and medical technology industry. BHI's content is featured on Yahoo!Finance, Google Finance, TheStreet.com, SeekingAlpha.com and many other blogs and websites. BHI is also a proud member of The Business of Biotech Network, and the Investors Blog Network.

Who's In Favor Of Safer Drugs?

Posted on 04/20/2007 11:29:57 | Link | Post Comment
by Mark S. Senak
Eye On FDA



The answer is probably simple. The answer is probably everyone.

I think all can agree on that. This week, as PDUFA is being discussed on the Hill, Consumer Reports released a poll of approximately 1000 individuals in a phone survey and found that that consumers want the FDA to have more authority over the drug industry on specific points. I could not get my hands on a copy of the actual survey to see what the questions where, but here is how Consumer Reports reported them.

96 percent agree that the government should have the power to require warning labels if safety problems are identified--with 80 percent of those "strongly agreeing" to that authority. Currently, the FDA must negotiate safety warning labels with a drug maker.

93 percent agree that the FDA should have the power to order follow-up safety studies, with 65 percent "strongly agreeing" to that authority. Currently, the FDA generally does not have the authority to require that a safety study be performed once a drug is on the market

84 percent agree that advertisements for a prescription drug with safety concerns should be prohibited, with 59 percent "strongly agreeing" to such limits.

92 percent of Americans agree that pharmaceutical companies should make public the results of all of their clinical trial studies, which reveal a drug's effectiveness as well as possible hazardous side effects. Of those, 68 percent "strongly agreed" that drug studies should be made public.


The nature of the responses does raise some questions about the questions. Does anyone not agree that warning labels should be added if safety problems are found? Warning labels are already added if safety problems are found. There have been a slew of black box warnings coming out of FDA, even though there has been no rinding that I know of that specifically demonstrates the actual effect on black box warnings in achieving their goal. Then an overwhelming number of people were in favor of banning advertising for drugs with safety concerns - but all drugs have safety concerns. All cars have safety concerns. All airline flights have safety concerns. I'm not sure I understand the context of the question.

I'm not saying the survey is wrong, or that its findings are off. I'm saying there isn't enough information in the material that I could find to tell me.

Lastly, I think that an important question I don't see is - do you want the FDA to have more authority, or do you want the FDA to do a better job with the authority it already has? It might be a question that made people think.


Source: EyeOnFDA.com



RELATED READING:
- What a Ban on DTC Means for Public Relations
- Leaving PDUFA Alone
- PDUFA Dollars Up, Warning Letters Down

____________________
Stock Quote or
Examples
ATM Wallstreet - Tue Jul 08, 2008 02:28PM
Why I traded the stock ME today. I had it on my list fr [read more]
Morpheus Trading - Thu Jul 03, 2008 07:49AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if [read more]
Morpheus Trading - Sun Jul 06, 2008 11:00PM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if [read more]

PREMIER SPONSORED LINKS

Most Visited Blogs | Most Popular Blogs | Most Recent Blogs | Contact Us | Terms and conditions | Privacy Policy

The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on TheMoneyBlogs.com are provided for personal finance, education and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of TheMoneyBlogs.com and there is no implied endorsement by TheMoneyBlogs.com of any advice or trading strategy. The analysts and employees or affiliates of TheMoneyBlogs.com may hold positions in the stocks or industries discussed here. Your use of this and all information contained on TheMoneyBlogs.com is governed by the Terms and Conditions of Use. Please click the link to view those terms. Follow this link to read our Editorial Policy.

Copyright © 2008 The Connors Group, Inc.