Quantcast What A Ban On Dtc Means For Public Relations
Search by tag or site Login to my blog ? Start my own blog














TheMoneyBlogs
Home
About
Create your own blog
Contact us
Vote for this blog!

BioHealth Investor

BioHealth Investor (BHI) is a blog and journal focused on providing updated commentary and financial news from the biotech and medical technology industry. BHI's content is featured on Yahoo!Finance, Google Finance, TheStreet.com, SeekingAlpha.com and many other blogs and websites. BHI is also a proud member of The Business of Biotech Network, and the Investors Blog Network.

What A Ban On Dtc Means For Public Relations

Posted on 04/17/2007 13:28:53 | Link | Post Comment
by Mark S. Senak
Eye On FDA



There have been several proposals before Congress which, in one way or another, have the potential to impact the amount of direct-to-consumer advertising (DTC) allowed. Some would give the FDA authority to restrict such advertising. Others have called for it to be abandoned for any new product's first few years on the market. What is the impact on new drug launches in the face of success of any such proposal?

Prior to the existence of DTC, public relations played an essential role in the launch of new medications and in the uptake of new medications, and it still does. But in the event of a ban or partial ban, the role of public relations to strategically inform the public - patients and prescribers - about the role of a new treatment obviously becomes more important. Innovators go through a great deal of money on funding research and development that is recouped when a drug comes to market - an uptake is an essential part of the formula. Therefore, it is incumbent on public relations companies to determine how such a ban would affect their communications strategies now, not later.

But it also raises another important point. There have also been proposals to raise the amount of money for review of DTC by FDA, despite the fact that the oversight by DDMAC as expressed through warning letters has shrunk to anemic levels in the past several years. If a part of DTC disappears, does FDA still need more money for DTC oversight? One would think with less enforcement over the past several years, and fewer potential ads, the money equation would flow the other way.


Source: EyeOnFDA.com


_____________________
Stock Quote or
Examples
Morpheus Trading - Mon Jul 21, 2008 08:33AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if [read more]
Morpheus Trading - Mon Jul 21, 2008 08:31AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them i [read more]
Millionaire Now! by Larry Nusbaum - Fri Jul 18, 2008 08:23AM
U.S. stock futures rebound on Citigroup results"S&a [read more]

PREMIER SPONSORED LINKS

Most Visited Blogs | Most Popular Blogs | Most Recent Blogs | Contact Us | Terms and conditions | Privacy Policy

The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on TheMoneyBlogs.com are provided for personal finance, education and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of TheMoneyBlogs.com and there is no implied endorsement by TheMoneyBlogs.com of any advice or trading strategy. The analysts and employees or affiliates of TheMoneyBlogs.com may hold positions in the stocks or industries discussed here. Your use of this and all information contained on TheMoneyBlogs.com is governed by the Terms and Conditions of Use. Please click the link to view those terms. Follow this link to read our Editorial Policy.

Copyright © 2008 The Connors Group, Inc.