| Search by tag or site | Login to my blog ? Start my own blog |
![]() |
BioHealth InvestorBioHealth Investor (BHI) is a blog and journal focused on providing updated commentary and financial news from the biotech and medical technology industry. BHI's content is featured on Yahoo!Finance, Google Finance, TheStreet.com, SeekingAlpha.com and many other blogs and websites. BHI is also a proud member of The Business of Biotech Network, and the Investors Blog Network. |
There He Goes Again - The Stem Cell Dogma
Posted on 06/21/2007 18:47:02 | Link | Post Comment
by Mark S. Senak
Eye On FDA
During the election for the office of president that pitted Jimmy Carter against Ronald Reagan, there was a famous utterance from "The Great Communicator" - "There he goes again..." said Ronald Reagan.
Yesterday, President Bush used his veto power for a second time on this issue, and only the third in his presidency (the first stem cell veto was in 2006) to approve a stem cell measure that would have allowed for broader stem cell research than is currently available. He said something to the effect that it was a moral imperative and that tax dollars should not be used to destroy human embryonic life. This ignores the fact that we already are allowing stem cell research for some existing lines. Even former First Lady Nancy Reagan has supported the research.
I wrote a posting after his earlier veto of a stem cell proposal that he, in fact, is ceding the competitive edge in this aspect of biotechnology to other countries in this important area of research.
The stem cells sought are those that are not from embryos that will ever see life. In fact, many will eventually be destroyed, their potentially life-saving cures destroyed with them. There is no deprivation of future life from stem cell research, only deprivation of life from those who would have potentially gained a cure or an effective treatment for a life-debilitating disease.
Actually, the real moral question that might be explored is - why do we have so many embryos that will never see life? That would be the real question - not whether once we have them, we should explore a cure. But that would require thought - what we get instead is dogma.
One is forced to wonder whether if we could derive a weapon from such research, would the Administration be of a different heart? That would be for taking life, not saving it. But that is hypothetical and I leave it to you to imagine the answer.
Still, I'm left with the conviction that the millions of desperately ill people suffering from Lou Gehrig's Disease, Alzheimer's, diabetes and a host of autoimmune disorders don't deserve thought and science over misguided dogma.
Unfortunately, there is not the political will in Congress to override this veto. Because, there he goes again.
RELATED READING:
- FDA Green Lights Harvest’s Stem Cell Trial
- US Stem Cell Policy: ceding the competitive edge
- Key Stem Cell Patents Revoked
- Stem Cell Stocks Gain On British Study, Geron Gives Some Back
Eye On FDA is a regular contributor to BioHealth Investor
_____________
Eye On FDA
During the election for the office of president that pitted Jimmy Carter against Ronald Reagan, there was a famous utterance from "The Great Communicator" - "There he goes again..." said Ronald Reagan.
Yesterday, President Bush used his veto power for a second time on this issue, and only the third in his presidency (the first stem cell veto was in 2006) to approve a stem cell measure that would have allowed for broader stem cell research than is currently available. He said something to the effect that it was a moral imperative and that tax dollars should not be used to destroy human embryonic life. This ignores the fact that we already are allowing stem cell research for some existing lines. Even former First Lady Nancy Reagan has supported the research.
I wrote a posting after his earlier veto of a stem cell proposal that he, in fact, is ceding the competitive edge in this aspect of biotechnology to other countries in this important area of research.
The stem cells sought are those that are not from embryos that will ever see life. In fact, many will eventually be destroyed, their potentially life-saving cures destroyed with them. There is no deprivation of future life from stem cell research, only deprivation of life from those who would have potentially gained a cure or an effective treatment for a life-debilitating disease.
Actually, the real moral question that might be explored is - why do we have so many embryos that will never see life? That would be the real question - not whether once we have them, we should explore a cure. But that would require thought - what we get instead is dogma.
One is forced to wonder whether if we could derive a weapon from such research, would the Administration be of a different heart? That would be for taking life, not saving it. But that is hypothetical and I leave it to you to imagine the answer.
Still, I'm left with the conviction that the millions of desperately ill people suffering from Lou Gehrig's Disease, Alzheimer's, diabetes and a host of autoimmune disorders don't deserve thought and science over misguided dogma.
Unfortunately, there is not the political will in Congress to override this veto. Because, there he goes again.
RELATED READING:
- FDA Green Lights Harvest’s Stem Cell Trial
- US Stem Cell Policy: ceding the competitive edge
- Key Stem Cell Patents Revoked
- Stem Cell Stocks Gain On British Study, Geron Gives Some Back
Eye On FDA is a regular contributor to BioHealth Investor
_____________
- Mri To Lead Growth In Medical-imaging Market
- Malaria And Hiv - Eradication And Treatment
- Dragon’s New Production Process To Cut Costs
- Mrsa Update: Cepheid, Basilea And Nektar
- If Only Us Health Care Could Be More Like The Patriots (or Even The Red Sox) And Less Like The Yankees
![]()
Examples
ATM Wallstreet - Mon Oct 06, 2008 03:39PM
Made several great trades today. Traded the QID, QQ [read more]
Made several great trades today. Traded the QID, QQ [read more]
ATM Wallstreet - Sat Oct 04, 2008 10:41PM
When I first started Day Trading I traded anything that [read more]
When I first started Day Trading I traded anything that [read more]
LearningMarkets.com - Fri Oct 03, 2008 03:14PM
Written by S. Wade Hansen Why Should You Care About O [read more]
Written by S. Wade Hansen Why Should You Care About O [read more]












<< My Home | TheMoneyBlogs Home