| Search by tag or site | Login to my blog ? Start my own blog |
![]() |
BioHealth InvestorBioHealth Investor (BHI) is a blog and journal focused on providing updated commentary and financial news from the biotech and medical technology industry. BHI's content is featured on Yahoo!Finance, Google Finance, TheStreet.com, SeekingAlpha.com and many other blogs and websites. BHI is also a proud member of The Business of Biotech Network, and the Investors Blog Network. |
Neurochem Gets Approvable Letter
Posted on 07/18/2007 19:35:23 | Link | Post Comment
by Mark S. Senak
Eye On FDA
The FDA has issued another approvable letter - this time to Neurochem (NRMX) for eprodisate (KIACTA(TM)) for the treatment of Amyloid A (AA) amyloidosis. This was not good news on two fronts - first, it was the product's second approvable letter and, second, it asks for more trial information, though the need for that information may change, pending circumstances. The first approvable letter was sent to the company in August, 2006 and the company submitted a response in October, 2006.
As you will no doubt remember from previous postings on approvable letters, such a letter represents a willingness by the FDA to approve a product, but sets out some conditions for that approval, which can include any combination of labeling changes, more clinical trials, risk management programs or other types of information or data.
According to the company press release on the approvable letter, "the FDA indicates that the Phase II/III clinical trial provided some evidence of the effectiveness of eprodisate (KIACTA™) in the treatment of the renal manifestations of amyloidosis; however, the FDA also indicated that an additional efficacy trial with a target p-value of 0.05 will be necessary before the FDA could approve the investigational product candidate. Further, the approvable letter states that additional submissions, filed by Neurochem as part of its complete response to this approvable letter, may address issues raised in this letter. The FDA has indicated that such additional submissions could persuade the agency to eliminate the requirement for an additional trial."
Another factor involved is that the FDA has asked that a QT clinical study should be submitted as part of a post-approval commitment. While the FDA does have the authority to force such a study it is only a matter of time, and the role of QT has been growing for all new approvals, signalling that companies that suspect a QT issue should try and address it proactively.
As noted in yesterday's posting, sometimes companies receiving multiple approvable letters are tempted to file an appeal to the FDA with a Formal Dispute Resolution (FDR), but that FDRs have not appeared to be a particularly dynamic way of achieving success. The news sent the stock down this morning.
Eye On FDA is a regular contributor to BioHealth Investor
_______________
Eye On FDA
The FDA has issued another approvable letter - this time to Neurochem (NRMX) for eprodisate (KIACTA(TM)) for the treatment of Amyloid A (AA) amyloidosis. This was not good news on two fronts - first, it was the product's second approvable letter and, second, it asks for more trial information, though the need for that information may change, pending circumstances. The first approvable letter was sent to the company in August, 2006 and the company submitted a response in October, 2006.
As you will no doubt remember from previous postings on approvable letters, such a letter represents a willingness by the FDA to approve a product, but sets out some conditions for that approval, which can include any combination of labeling changes, more clinical trials, risk management programs or other types of information or data.
According to the company press release on the approvable letter, "the FDA indicates that the Phase II/III clinical trial provided some evidence of the effectiveness of eprodisate (KIACTA™) in the treatment of the renal manifestations of amyloidosis; however, the FDA also indicated that an additional efficacy trial with a target p-value of 0.05 will be necessary before the FDA could approve the investigational product candidate. Further, the approvable letter states that additional submissions, filed by Neurochem as part of its complete response to this approvable letter, may address issues raised in this letter. The FDA has indicated that such additional submissions could persuade the agency to eliminate the requirement for an additional trial."
Another factor involved is that the FDA has asked that a QT clinical study should be submitted as part of a post-approval commitment. While the FDA does have the authority to force such a study it is only a matter of time, and the role of QT has been growing for all new approvals, signalling that companies that suspect a QT issue should try and address it proactively.
As noted in yesterday's posting, sometimes companies receiving multiple approvable letters are tempted to file an appeal to the FDA with a Formal Dispute Resolution (FDR), but that FDRs have not appeared to be a particularly dynamic way of achieving success. The news sent the stock down this morning.
Eye On FDA is a regular contributor to BioHealth Investor
_______________
- Mri To Lead Growth In Medical-imaging Market
- Malaria And Hiv - Eradication And Treatment
- Dragon’s New Production Process To Cut Costs
- Mrsa Update: Cepheid, Basilea And Nektar
- If Only Us Health Care Could Be More Like The Patriots (or Even The Red Sox) And Less Like The Yankees
![]()
- e-techblog
- Wishing Wealth
- Financial Skeptic
- Don't Mess With Taxes
- Millionaire Now! by Larry Nusbaum
- 360 Digest
Examples
Morpheus Trading - Thu Jul 17, 2008 01:15AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if th [read more]
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if th [read more]
Morpheus Trading - Mon Jul 21, 2008 08:33AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if [read more]
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if [read more]
The Swing of Things - Thu Jul 17, 2008 09:36AM
I used to make a pretty good living sharing hard won [read more]
I used to make a pretty good living sharing hard won [read more]












<< My Home | TheMoneyBlogs Home