| Search by tag or site | Login to my blog ? Start my own blog |
![]() |
BioHealth InvestorBioHealth Investor (BHI) is a blog and journal focused on providing updated commentary and financial news from the biotech and medical technology industry. BHI's content is featured on Yahoo!Finance, Google Finance, TheStreet.com, SeekingAlpha.com and many other blogs and websites. BHI is also a proud member of The Business of Biotech Network, and the Investors Blog Network. |
Fda Failing To Acknowledge Image Problems
Posted on 03/07/2007 19:56:14 | Link | Post Comment
by Mark S. Senak
EyeOnFDA.com
Two articles from this weekend demonstrate the problems that the FDA is having with respect to its image, and confirm that one of the biggest issues is an obstinate refusal to acknowledge that there even are problems.
An interview in the New Jersey Star Ledger with Dr. Andrew C. von Eschenbach is shows the disconnect the FDA has between its actions and its words. And for those harboring hope that the new leadership would set to work on improving things - well, this is reason to reconsider.
The interviewer asked Dr. von Eschenbach whether or not the criticism of the FDA over the past few years has been justified. His response: "There is reality and then there's perception. Sometimes in this town those two things get confused. The point is, it doesn't matter. For me, if it is a perception, it is important....I want an agency in which people bring different points of view, divergent perspectives...At the end of the day, you make a decision."
Reality and perception aren't the only things confused. What the heck does that mean? Does it mean anything? Then he goes on.
"When people have concerns how that decision was made, they must have an opportunity to have that addressed. I think if we create that with the open transparency it deserves, and create it with integrity and commitment that is real, then that will be something that will change the perception as well as the atmosphere."
Ok, here was an opportunity to lay out a vision for restoring credibility in the agency. Crisis control - acknowledge the problem and let people know what you are going to do about it. This was a missed opportunity. This is on the heels of an interview with the New York Times a few weeks ago that was, as I termed then, lackluster.
But then also on Sunday, the Washington Post reported on the FDA's imminent approval of cefquinome, an antibiotic for cattle. The title of the article was "FDA Rules Override Warnings About Drug" and it reports that the FDA is about to approve a drug to which several highly credible parties have lodged objections, including its own advisory committee which met, considered the drug and voted against approval.
I don't know anything about the drug but I do know about communications and process.
Perception - reality? Transparency? When the FDA acts against the advice of its own advisors, there should be a good reason, and it needs to be clearly communicated. Dr. von Eschenbach's arcane perception, reality thing in the Star Ledger does not match to the coverage of an FDA decision in the Washington Post.
So some advice: As in prior postings, the FDA does need to get its act together about communication respecting image. Denying there is a problem simply does not do the job. And then, with respect to interviews:
The agency is not only sorely in need of a good communications plan to help restore its image, but also of having it well-executed. That goal will not be achieved by telling people what you want them to believe, but by a clear effort to get to the root of the problems and fix them.
Source: EyeOnFDA.com
RELATED READING:
- FDA Cuts Women Health Budgeting
- New FDA Commisioner Silent Since Taking Helm
_____________________
EyeOnFDA.com
Two articles from this weekend demonstrate the problems that the FDA is having with respect to its image, and confirm that one of the biggest issues is an obstinate refusal to acknowledge that there even are problems.
An interview in the New Jersey Star Ledger with Dr. Andrew C. von Eschenbach is shows the disconnect the FDA has between its actions and its words. And for those harboring hope that the new leadership would set to work on improving things - well, this is reason to reconsider.
The interviewer asked Dr. von Eschenbach whether or not the criticism of the FDA over the past few years has been justified. His response: "There is reality and then there's perception. Sometimes in this town those two things get confused. The point is, it doesn't matter. For me, if it is a perception, it is important....I want an agency in which people bring different points of view, divergent perspectives...At the end of the day, you make a decision."
Reality and perception aren't the only things confused. What the heck does that mean? Does it mean anything? Then he goes on.
"When people have concerns how that decision was made, they must have an opportunity to have that addressed. I think if we create that with the open transparency it deserves, and create it with integrity and commitment that is real, then that will be something that will change the perception as well as the atmosphere."
Ok, here was an opportunity to lay out a vision for restoring credibility in the agency. Crisis control - acknowledge the problem and let people know what you are going to do about it. This was a missed opportunity. This is on the heels of an interview with the New York Times a few weeks ago that was, as I termed then, lackluster.
But then also on Sunday, the Washington Post reported on the FDA's imminent approval of cefquinome, an antibiotic for cattle. The title of the article was "FDA Rules Override Warnings About Drug" and it reports that the FDA is about to approve a drug to which several highly credible parties have lodged objections, including its own advisory committee which met, considered the drug and voted against approval.
I don't know anything about the drug but I do know about communications and process.
Perception - reality? Transparency? When the FDA acts against the advice of its own advisors, there should be a good reason, and it needs to be clearly communicated. Dr. von Eschenbach's arcane perception, reality thing in the Star Ledger does not match to the coverage of an FDA decision in the Washington Post.
So some advice: As in prior postings, the FDA does need to get its act together about communication respecting image. Denying there is a problem simply does not do the job. And then, with respect to interviews:
First, the FDA needs to put together some messaging to answer various types of questions. Dr. von Eschenbach's rambling isn't doing anyone any favors.
Second, someone needs to media train him. He is not using the interview opportunity to enunciate a vision or to any other agency advantage. He is not bridging questions he is asked back to a set of primary core messages.
Third, when he does speak, he needs to make sure that his statements line up with agency actions to build credibility.
The agency is not only sorely in need of a good communications plan to help restore its image, but also of having it well-executed. That goal will not be achieved by telling people what you want them to believe, but by a clear effort to get to the root of the problems and fix them.
Source: EyeOnFDA.com
RELATED READING:
- FDA Cuts Women Health Budgeting
- New FDA Commisioner Silent Since Taking Helm
_____________________
- Mri To Lead Growth In Medical-imaging Market
- Malaria And Hiv - Eradication And Treatment
- Dragon’s New Production Process To Cut Costs
- Mrsa Update: Cepheid, Basilea And Nektar
- If Only Us Health Care Could Be More Like The Patriots (or Even The Red Sox) And Less Like The Yankees
![]()
- Newmark's Door
- The Family CEO
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Credit Bloggers
- Wishing Wealth
- Financial Skeptic
Examples
Boucher On The Big Picture - Thu Aug 14, 2008 04:54PM
Watch Interest Rates Next For Clue as to When Downside R [read more]
Watch Interest Rates Next For Clue as to When Downside R [read more]
Morpheus Trading - Thu Aug 14, 2008 07:54AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if [read more]
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if [read more]
Editorial Spotlight - Fri Aug 15, 2008 10:33AM
They say the most dangerous enemy is the one you don’ [read more]
They say the most dangerous enemy is the one you don’ [read more]












<< My Home | TheMoneyBlogs Home