Quantcast Fda Cuts Women Health Budgeting
Search by tag or site Login to my blog ? Start my own blog














TheMoneyBlogs
Home
About
Create your own blog
Contact us
Vote for this blog!

BioHealth Investor

BioHealth Investor (BHI) is a blog and journal focused on providing updated commentary and financial news from the biotech and medical technology industry. BHI's content is featured on Yahoo!Finance, Google Finance, TheStreet.com, SeekingAlpha.com and many other blogs and websites. BHI is also a proud member of The Business of Biotech Network, and the Investors Blog Network.

Fda Cuts Women Health Budgeting

Posted on 03/07/2007 15:00:17 | Link | Post Comment
by Mark S. Senak
EyeOnFDA.com



Are the women of America suddenly facing less health concerns than they have been for the sixteen years? Common sense probably says the answer is no. But common sense does not appear to be involved in FDA budgeting decisions.

For the past 16 years, Congress has allocated $4 million towards the Office of Womens Health (OWH). However, this week it became apparent that $1.2 million dollar's worth of that budget was disappearing, despite congressional and presidential requests to the contrary. What gives?

The move prompted the Society for Women's Health Research to state their opposition to these cuts and also brought protest from the three former directors of the OWH, both statements being exhibited at OBGYN.net.

According to the Washington Post article on the issue from February 27, this cut will effectively shut down the OWH activities for the balance of the year. Reportedly, the OWH will, as a result of the cuts, have committed this year to spending more money than it actually has left in its budget. Who operates an agency that way?

As you may recall, the OWH was at the center of the Plan B controversy and its director resigned because of the FDA's fumbled handling of Plan B. Is the budget cut someone's way of issuing payback to the OWH? Such concerns were expressed by several who were interviewed for the article. In the absence of any other explanation, such a point of view will no doubt stick.

But this is hardly the kind of perception this beleaguered and highly troubled agency needs at this time. Every single act by the agency should be a step to restoring its reputation, not subjecting it to further question and scrutiny. About the smartest thing that the FDA has accomplished in the past year is to put the Plan B fiasco behind it. If the concerns regarding retribution true, the action is not only ham-handed, it fuels the flames of doubt over the agency has become more political than scientific under this Administration and undermines any ability of the FDA to move on from the morass in which it is stuck.

Several Senators also joined the chorus and called on the Commissioner to see to it that this cut is reversed. If he knows what he is doing, Dr. von Eshenbach will make sure that the cut is not only immediately restored, but that this sort of action not occur in the future.


Source: EyeOnFDA.com



RELATED READING:
- Companies Provide Numerous Hormone Therapy Options for Women
- Public Awareness Needed Before Mandate to Vaccinate Girls with Merck's Gardasil
____________________
Stock Quote or
Examples
Morpheus Trading - Mon Jul 21, 2008 08:33AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if [read more]
Morpheus Trading - Mon Jul 21, 2008 08:31AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them i [read more]
Millionaire Now! by Larry Nusbaum - Tue Jul 22, 2008 09:23AM
Hedge funds have made billions this year shorting the banks, [read more]

PREMIER SPONSORED LINKS

Most Visited Blogs | Most Popular Blogs | Most Recent Blogs | Contact Us | Terms and conditions | Privacy Policy

The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on TheMoneyBlogs.com are provided for personal finance, education and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of TheMoneyBlogs.com and there is no implied endorsement by TheMoneyBlogs.com of any advice or trading strategy. The analysts and employees or affiliates of TheMoneyBlogs.com may hold positions in the stocks or industries discussed here. Your use of this and all information contained on TheMoneyBlogs.com is governed by the Terms and Conditions of Use. Please click the link to view those terms. Follow this link to read our Editorial Policy.

Copyright © 2008 The Connors Group, Inc.