| Search by tag or site | Login to my blog ? Start my own blog |
![]() |
BioHealth InvestorBioHealth Investor (BHI) is a blog and journal focused on providing updated commentary and financial news from the biotech and medical technology industry. BHI's content is featured on Yahoo!Finance, Google Finance, TheStreet.com, SeekingAlpha.com and many other blogs and websites. BHI is also a proud member of The Business of Biotech Network, and the Investors Blog Network. |
Another Otc Attempt For Mevacor
Posted on 10/29/2007 14:09 PM | Link | Post Comment
by Mark S. Senak
Eye On FDA
In July of 2000, two companies tried to take statins from RX to OTC. The first was Bristol Myers Squibb (BMY) attempting to switch Pravachol and the other was Merck trying to switch Mevacor. Today, there is a Federal Register notice published that Merck (MRK) is back for more and will attempt to persuade the Non-Prescription Drugs Advisory Committee and the Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee to vote for the switch.
I was present at both meetings in July 2000. One of the things that stood in the way of a switch was a key factor involved in RX-OTC switches - the ability of patients to self-diagnose and self-treat. A patient does not easily have a way to take and monitor cholesterol levels. In addition, the advisory committees seemed to be seeking a great deal of additional information and studies prior to an approval. Lastly, there were concerns about what dose people take the statin and how people can self-titrate if they can't self monitor - yet the higher the dose, the higher likelihood of adverse events. It was a lot for a sponsor to work out. And the OTC statin presents unique challenges that are coming up not only with this meeting, scheduled for December 13, but which will occur just weeks after the FDA meets to consider the issue of behind-the-counter (BTC) drugs.
The environment for this proposed switch is in contrast to that of 2000. For one thing, the first attempt occurred when the FDA was still enjoying its gold standard. Will the agency's risk-averse nature today affect a switch like this? Also, Since the time of the original OTC switch attempts, the cast of characters has changed - each committee is made up of different persons. And lastly, there is new research on statins that suggest added benefits beyond lipid lowering, i.e., a role in cancer prevention. That may spell a benefit of even greater magnitude, or it could mean that people who feel at risk for cancer, might start taking a statin for that benefit rather than lipid lowering. Is that a risk or a benefit. The committee will have a lot to talk about.
Eye On FDA is a regular contributor to BioHealth Investor
__________
Eye On FDA
In July of 2000, two companies tried to take statins from RX to OTC. The first was Bristol Myers Squibb (BMY) attempting to switch Pravachol and the other was Merck trying to switch Mevacor. Today, there is a Federal Register notice published that Merck (MRK) is back for more and will attempt to persuade the Non-Prescription Drugs Advisory Committee and the Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee to vote for the switch.
I was present at both meetings in July 2000. One of the things that stood in the way of a switch was a key factor involved in RX-OTC switches - the ability of patients to self-diagnose and self-treat. A patient does not easily have a way to take and monitor cholesterol levels. In addition, the advisory committees seemed to be seeking a great deal of additional information and studies prior to an approval. Lastly, there were concerns about what dose people take the statin and how people can self-titrate if they can't self monitor - yet the higher the dose, the higher likelihood of adverse events. It was a lot for a sponsor to work out. And the OTC statin presents unique challenges that are coming up not only with this meeting, scheduled for December 13, but which will occur just weeks after the FDA meets to consider the issue of behind-the-counter (BTC) drugs.
The environment for this proposed switch is in contrast to that of 2000. For one thing, the first attempt occurred when the FDA was still enjoying its gold standard. Will the agency's risk-averse nature today affect a switch like this? Also, Since the time of the original OTC switch attempts, the cast of characters has changed - each committee is made up of different persons. And lastly, there is new research on statins that suggest added benefits beyond lipid lowering, i.e., a role in cancer prevention. That may spell a benefit of even greater magnitude, or it could mean that people who feel at risk for cancer, might start taking a statin for that benefit rather than lipid lowering. Is that a risk or a benefit. The committee will have a lot to talk about.
Eye On FDA is a regular contributor to BioHealth Investor
__________
- Mri To Lead Growth In Medical-imaging Market
- Malaria And Hiv - Eradication And Treatment
- Dragon’s New Production Process To Cut Costs
- Mrsa Update: Cepheid, Basilea And Nektar
- If Only Us Health Care Could Be More Like The Patriots (or Even The Red Sox) And Less Like The Yankees
![]()
- e-techblog
- Wishing Wealth
- Financial Skeptic
- Don't Mess With Taxes
- Millionaire Now! by Larry Nusbaum
- 360 Digest
Examples
Morpheus Trading - Thu Jul 17, 2008 01:15AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if th [read more]
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if th [read more]
Morpheus Trading - Mon Jul 21, 2008 08:33AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if [read more]
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if [read more]
The Swing of Things - Thu Jul 17, 2008 09:36AM
I used to make a pretty good living sharing hard won [read more]
I used to make a pretty good living sharing hard won [read more]












<< My Home | TheMoneyBlogs Home