| Search by tag or site | Login to my blog ? Start my own blog |
 |
BioHealth InvestorBioHealth Investor (BHI) is a blog and journal focused on providing updated commentary and financial news from the biotech and medical technology industry. BHI's content is featured on Yahoo!Finance, Google Finance, TheStreet.com, SeekingAlpha.com and many other blogs and websites. BHI is also a proud member of The Business of Biotech Network, and the Investors Blog Network. |
Aarp Quest For Health Care 'leverage' Doesn't Bother Ny Times
Posted on 04/20/2007 11:29:36 | Link | Post Comment
by Dan Gainor
Business & Media Institute
Group's move toward health insurance is controversial, but reporter Robert Pear only talks with AARP execs and allies.
Even when its actions “create a tremendous number of potential conflicts,” The New York Times treats AARP with respect and softens any criticism by consulting only the group’s friends.
AARP announced it will start offering health insurance to people 50 to 64 sometime next year. When that happens, AARP will “be the largest provider of private insurance to Medicare recipients,” the Times wrote on April 17. But the left-wing AARP will continue being the nation’s largest senior lobbying group – creating an obvious conflict about what it lobbies for. But the Times didn’t look very hard at that conflict.
The Times quoted just four people in its 700-word article – two executives at AARP and liberal Rep. Pete Stark (D-Calif.), who earned a 95-percent rating from Americans for Democratic Action in 2006. The last was Judith A. Stein, director of the Center for Medicare Advocacy, which reporter Robert Pear described as “a nonprofit group that counsels people on Medicare.”
Stark, who chairs the House Ways and Means subcommittee on health, was enthusiastic, saying “they could be a wonderful addition.” Stein raised the possibility of conflict in cautious terms, but that’s what happens when reporters try to get criticism from an organization’s allies. “Ms. Stein and her organization work closely with AARP,” Pear explained deep into the story.
That might explain her measured approach to critique. “AARP will not be perceived as a truly independent advocate on Medicare if it’s making hefty profits by selling insurance products that provide Medicare coverage,” she reportedly said.
AARP certainly isn’t downplaying the huge power it will have. “The group said also it would use its leverage to reshape the health insurance market,” said Pear.
The story also treated AARP as the only game in town or “the lobby for older Americans.” Conservatives at the United Seniors Association would probably disagree.
Source: BusinessAndMedia.org
RELATED READING:
- "60 Minutes" Takes 13 Minutes to Attack Drug Companies
- Cancer Drug, but not Drug Company, Praised by Networks
______________________
Business & Media Institute
Group's move toward health insurance is controversial, but reporter Robert Pear only talks with AARP execs and allies.
Even when its actions “create a tremendous number of potential conflicts,” The New York Times treats AARP with respect and softens any criticism by consulting only the group’s friends.
AARP announced it will start offering health insurance to people 50 to 64 sometime next year. When that happens, AARP will “be the largest provider of private insurance to Medicare recipients,” the Times wrote on April 17. But the left-wing AARP will continue being the nation’s largest senior lobbying group – creating an obvious conflict about what it lobbies for. But the Times didn’t look very hard at that conflict.
The Times quoted just four people in its 700-word article – two executives at AARP and liberal Rep. Pete Stark (D-Calif.), who earned a 95-percent rating from Americans for Democratic Action in 2006. The last was Judith A. Stein, director of the Center for Medicare Advocacy, which reporter Robert Pear described as “a nonprofit group that counsels people on Medicare.”
Stark, who chairs the House Ways and Means subcommittee on health, was enthusiastic, saying “they could be a wonderful addition.” Stein raised the possibility of conflict in cautious terms, but that’s what happens when reporters try to get criticism from an organization’s allies. “Ms. Stein and her organization work closely with AARP,” Pear explained deep into the story.
That might explain her measured approach to critique. “AARP will not be perceived as a truly independent advocate on Medicare if it’s making hefty profits by selling insurance products that provide Medicare coverage,” she reportedly said.
AARP certainly isn’t downplaying the huge power it will have. “The group said also it would use its leverage to reshape the health insurance market,” said Pear.
The story also treated AARP as the only game in town or “the lobby for older Americans.” Conservatives at the United Seniors Association would probably disagree.
Source: BusinessAndMedia.org
RELATED READING:
- "60 Minutes" Takes 13 Minutes to Attack Drug Companies
- Cancer Drug, but not Drug Company, Praised by Networks
______________________
- Mri To Lead Growth In Medical-imaging Market
- Malaria And Hiv - Eradication And Treatment
- Dragon’s New Production Process To Cut Costs
- Mrsa Update: Cepheid, Basilea And Nektar
- If Only Us Health Care Could Be More Like The Patriots (or Even The Red Sox) And Less Like The Yankees
Examples
Morpheus Trading - Thu Jul 17, 2008 01:15AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if th [read more]
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if th [read more]
Morpheus Trading - Tue Jul 15, 2008 08:25AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them [read more]
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them [read more]
Morpheus Trading - Mon Jul 14, 2008 02:18AM
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if [read more]
NOTE: Please click on the charts below to enlarge them if [read more]
<< My Home | TheMoneyBlogs Home